HANA News Blog

ACDOCA - central element in S/4 HANA

Jens Gleichmann • 10. Dezember 2024

ACDOCA table growth - how to handle it

 Anyone dealing with S/4HANA heard about universal journal and the table ACDOCA. It is one central element of the S/4HANA simplification and also one of the largest and fastest growing tables.

Due to this fact I had to deal with it 2 years ago in the context of data tiering (NSE). The tables had 448 columns with the release S/4HANA 1909. SAP warned to use NSE for central complex tables, but the customer was brave enough to test it with Capture&Replay before going live with it. We achieved with our NSE design an average saving rate of 23% (max. 38%) of the table size.

2 years later we are reviewing this design again and I wondered about the size and the low saving rate. The customer updated to S/4HANA 2022 and has now 494 fields! This means 46 additional fields. Over the years the releases received several new default fields and sometimes also customer extensibilities (SAP Note 2453614).

There are some kind of "What's New in SAP S/4HANA xxxx" documents, but they are not covering all changes regarding all new fields. The new fields are also responsible for a 5% higher growth and of course the lower NSE saving rate.

I started to figure out which field was introduced with which release but the documentation is about such details is a mess:

S/4HANA 1909 ACRVALDAT 
S/4HANA 2020 FIPEX 
S/4HANA 2021 CBTTYPE RFCCUR FCSL 
S/4HANA 2022 AUFNR_ORG VORNR_ORG

We analyzed the new SQLs running against ACDOCA and the new fields. We adapted our strategy and could eleminate 93% of the new not considered growth. This means not 5% growth rather 0,35%. This small number might not impress but if the table has a size of over 400GB and you save 80 or 100GB it matters. If you also consider other big tables for NSE like PRCD_ELEMENTS or CDPOS you can save multiple 100GBs which will save hardware costs, license / maintenance costs. In our case our first ACDOCA NSE design was very conservative to hold the performance impact as low as possible. With our new design we are more aggressive but always with a trade-off in mind. We increased out savings from 21% to 30%. This means for this system about 280GB savings.

In the end nothing speaks against NSE with ACDOCA.

Keep in mind: You should always combine NSE with archiving, but this is not possible in all scenarios. 

SAP HANA News by XLC

von Jens Gleichmann 14. April 2026
KVM as alternative with low TCO
inverted individual index is a special type of SAP HANA index wich can save memory
von Jens Gleichmann 6. April 2026
An inverted individual index is a special type of SAP HANA index which can only cover unique indexes. This includes all primary key structures. Unlike traditional column store indexes on more than one column (inverted value, inverted hash) an inverted individual index (Inv Idv Idx) doesn't need a dedicated concat.
Total NSE savings
von Jens Gleichmann 5. April 2026
This blog presents the results of a customer case which can be used as a reference for other implementations
SAP HANA performance issues with THP on multi-NUMA node systems
von Jens Gleichmann 30. März 2026
SAP HANA systems may experience high swap usage, hangs, or performance issues when THP (Transparent Huge Pages) is enabled with "madvise". This occurs on multi-NUMA node systems where one or more NUMA nodes are close to full memory usage while others have plenty of free memory, and counters for THP allocations, direct
Transparent Huge Pages (THP) with madvise can trigger high swap usage and performance issues
von Matthias Sander 26. Januar 2026
Transparent Huge Pages (THP) with madvise can trigger high swap usage, performance issues, or even system hangs on multi-NUMA systems.
HANA performance degradation after upgrade to SPS07+SPS08
von Jens Gleichmann 9. Januar 2026
With SPS06 and even stronger in SPS07 the HEX engine was pushed to be used more often. This results on the one hand side in easy scenario to perfect results with lower memory and CPU consumption ending up in faster response times. But in scenarios with FAE (for all entries) together with FDA (fast data access), it can result in bad performance. After some customers upgraded their first systems to SPS07 I recommended to wait for Rev. 73/74. But some started early with Rev. 71/72 and we had to troubleshoot many statement. If you have similar performance issues after the upgrade to SPS07 feel free to contact us! Our current recommendation is to use Rev. 74 with some workarounds. The performance degradation is extreme in systems like EWM and BW with high analytical workload.
SAP HANA NSE - a technical deepdive with Q&A
von Jens Gleichmann 24. November 2025
SAP NSE was introduced with HANA 2.0 SPS04 and based on a similar approach like data aging. Data aging based on a application level approach which has a side effect if you are using a lot of Z-coding. You have to use special BADI's to access the correct data. This means you have to adapt your coding if you are using it for Z-tables or using not SAP standard functions for accessing the data in your Z-coding. In this blog we will talk about the technical aspects in more detail.
Partitioning process
von Jens Gleichmann 24. November 2025
SAP HANA scaling and tuning with proper partitioning designs
R+R: intersection and missing services
von Jens Gleichmann 25. September 2025
In transformation projects like SAP RISE / SAP Cloud ERP, the Roles & Responsibilities (R+R) list often serves as the backbone for collaboration between customer, partner, and SAP. Yet too often, this list is treated as a static document rather than a living framework. Sometimes nobody knows exactly what was defined by
Why Databases Need Optimizer Statistics – With a Focus on SAP HANA
von Jens Gleichmann 28. Mai 2025
In the world of modern database management systems, query performance is not just a matter of hardware—it’s about smart execution plans. At the core of generating these plans lies a critical component: optimizer statistics. This article explores why databases need optimizer statistics, with particular emphasis on SAP HANA, while drawing parallels with Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server (MSSQL), and IBM DB2.
more